Thu. Sep 21st, 2023
    The US v. Google Trial Begins: Examining Deals, Data, and Monopoly Claims

    The US v. Google trial has commenced, marking one of the largest antitrust cases in recent history. The trial centers around the US Justice Department’s argument that Google’s dominant position in the search engine market is not solely a result of superior design, but rather a result of coercive deals that have hindered competition. On the other hand, Google contends that it is being unfairly targeted for its success.

    The trial began with relatively little fanfare, with a small crowd in attendance. The case against Google is straightforward yet potentially explosive: the Justice Department claims that around 2010, Google began using anti-competitive tactics to maintain its monopoly in the search engine market. This was achieved through securing deals to make Google the default search engine on popular platforms like Apple’s Safari and Mozilla’s Firefox, as well as requiring Android manufacturers to prominently display the Google search widget on smartphones.

    The Justice Department asserts that these agreements, coupled with Google’s use of vast amounts of search data to enhance its engine, have created an almost insurmountable barrier for competitors. The outcome of this trial will determine the future of the internet and whether Google’s search engine will face any meaningful competition.

    This case follows previous legal battles aimed at curbing the power of major tech companies. It represents the most significant antitrust action taken by the Justice Department since its lawsuit against Microsoft in the 1990s. However, recent rulings in favor of Apple and Microsoft have displayed a trend of courts favoring the tech giants and their claims of consumer benefit.

    Throughout the trial, the Justice Department has presented internal communications to support its case, highlighting Google’s emphasis on the value it gains from being the default search option. Google, in response, argues that its default search deals provide necessary revenue for web browsers and contribute to the success of mobile competitors to iOS.

    The trial is expected to delve into further evidence and arguments in the coming weeks as both sides make their case. It will ultimately determine if Google’s dominance in the search engine market has come at the expense of fair competition and consumer choice.

    – Adi Robertson, The Verge